The question was asked on A New Earth message board at Oprah dot com "Do you believe in right and wrong?"
In other words: can we judge other people's behavior from some absolute standard of right and wrong that people really oughtta live up to and quit being "wrong" so much of the time, and living their lives "wrong"?
I believe this question can be better asked. I believe the question is an irresolvable linguistic decoy, a lure of sorts that somehow keep us distracted from the true matter at hand, and arguing amongst ourselves.
Everyone who has asked this question through history, and argued for and against a mental position to identify with, seems to be asking: Is there Right that applies to everyone, and Wrong that applies to everyone?
Restated, the question's not so obvious flaw becomes glaringly clear:
Is there Absolute Right and Absolute Wrong?
This is clearly, upon inspection, a Relative Question seeking an Absolute Answer. Linguistically, it is beyond resolution. Historically, we can see that.
Conceptually it is not however.
The concept of Absolute is at the same time inclusive and exclusive, and it first and foremost requires an agreement. It includes everything, since it is Absolute. It's all there is or ever can be, ultimately. Thus, by definition, it excludes everything, that is it allows nothing else. It even precludes coneptualizing anything else. Once we agree to conceptualize something as Absolute, we agree to not conceive of it possibly having a polar opposite. It can have aspects, like it is both inclusive and exclusive - but it cannot itself be opposed. That's the linguistic agreement. (It may be the one alluded to in the mythological story of Babel and the confounding of languages. I'm not sure - just a thought.)
In other words, If there IS Absolute Right, there cannot, by definition of Absolute, be Wrong.
Is There Absolute Right and Wrong? is a silly question, linguistically. We've agreed linguistically that Absolute is One Thing, Unity. It would seem a trifle dopey to get into a big discussion of what it's two aspects might be.
(Especially two thousand years of discussion, sometimes agreement, lots of disagreement, fighting, and so on... I was just noticing this. Perhaps you've noticed too.)
You see, Absolute Right would be All Right, Just Right, Only Right, Nothing But Right - that is, Right with No Other Side.
Thus, you have to choose one word of the two. You get to ask "Is there Absolute _____", and you can only choose one word.
Remember, we only get one question...
So there I am, it's my turn to ask my one question. Personally, I am not going to ask if there is absolute wrong. It seems a not so grand way to ask, given the grand and glorious moment of Grand Presence.
Nope, I would ask:
Is there Absolute Right?
Is there Right, and nothing but Right? Is there Right, with No Other Side?
And actually, I would substitute a word.
I would ask:
Is there Absolute Love?
Is there Love, with No Other Side?
Having finally figured this out, I've asked. I've had the answer confirmed countless times now. I see it confirmed everywhere I turn. This, for sure, is my question. It's the question I live, for as we are reminded in the song Grasshopper "When you live the question the answer is today."
CAUTION: This may not be the question you want to ask. Be careful. You see, if the answer comes back "YES!" - if there is Absolute Right - then it means that the Absolute Idea of Right applies to everything going on here and now, everything you can imagine or have ever witnessed. Everything you ever felt guilty about. Everything you ever condemned too.
Ev. Ree. Thing.
It means that you can go ahead and see Creation as perfect. Right now. NOW.
It means it is all good. Including you. You have nothing to attain. Nothing to add. Not even anything to understand.
It means, in other words, that you are looking at, and standing smack dab in the middle of your little piece of.... drum roll, please....
A NEW EARTH!!!!
Smile. A.N.E. is looking back at you, at every turn.
It's Time That Time Was Overthrown,
Greg, with Alice...